How h4831 vs h4831sc can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
How h4831 vs h4831sc can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
Blog Article
What's All people obtaining superior accuracy with for 180gr tablets and 4831? Just on the lookout for a place to begin so I don't waste a lot of parts. Many thanks for the help!
H4831 will perform from the Swift although not authentic perfectly. You will by no means obtain the pressures you may need for regularity While using the .223. 760, or H414 will be better but for some explanation I ain't the most important supporter of most ball powders.
The fact that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is specifically why you happen to be looking at bigger velocities attained with that powder, as opposed to what you've viewed While using the IMR things. Also fantastic powder, but rather improved suited to a little bit lesser circumstances using a bit much less capacity.
I've experienced some rifles that fouled genuinely lousy. Finding each of the copper out was an actual PIA until I discovered Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
My encounter is that the SC and SSC loaded to exactly the same weight as being the lengthy Minimize demonstrates a reduced velocity.
I'm sure, rough periods. H4831SC will definitely work, I just failed to like the case density when loaded extensive. I do not keep in mind powder cost off the best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that is wherever I usually goal to become. As part of your circumstance utilizing what you might have (and what I ought to have done) I'd get started with the end in the bearing floor of your bullet right on the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there once you locate a velocity node.
Hodgdon H4831SC (Quick Reduce) extruded rifle propellant is usually a top rated choice for big match hunters who use handloader rifles. Introduced inside the nineteen fifties, this propellant has long been improved with shorter grain sizes which permits much better powder move and a lot more uniformity.
The SC or SSC specified powders Usually allow for bigger load density, in order to normally get a tad much more powder inside of a supplied case when applying compressed loads. Utilization h4831sc load data of a fall tube can even more improve this edge.
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t pleased with the velocity. Immediately after months, I obtained Fortunate and caught some H1000 on the internet and of h4831sc course paid a little extra. The quite following 7 days in a gun present a guy experienced a complete case of H1000 for $40 for each 1lb. I ignore simply how much, but Along with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.
The 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they may have slowed down the swift to point out that their rifles are improved. It bug the hell outside of me. I'm sure superior. This is why I don't at any time toss out my older manuals. I do obtain new manual all the time to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ one hundred+ degrees without any problems.
This can be an older thread, you may not receive a response, and will be reviving an previous thread. Please consider developing a new thread.
Yes, You should utilize the identical load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, but the SC Model may help you get a little additional in scenarios in which you are maxing out case volume While using the normal powder right before reaching strain restrictions.
While IMR 4831 and H4831SC are distinctive powders, you'll find that in several instances, exactly where one of them is detailed another might be in addition. Also, you will discover there is a reasonably dependable relationship in between them in regards to outlined loads.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are various. Where by there's a chance you're puzzling it and thinking that it really is near is H4831 and H4831SC are really similar. These h4831sc load data two are pretty much the same besides H4831SC is built to smaller grains so it meters simpler.